12/14/2022 0 Comments Trump finances![]() ![]() ![]() Mehta ordered Mazars to release subpoenaed documents from 20 related to Mr. "It has presented the requisite degree of evidence to substantiate the Committee's legislative purpose," he wrote. None are persuasive."Īs for investigations related to emoluments, Mehta found that the committee "is not engaged in a baseless fishing expedition." Trump finances series#"None of the cited evidence convinces the court that the Committee issued the subpoena to Mazars for an improper purpose," Judge Mehta wrote, but later said that the House committee "offers a series of independent reasons why President Trump's personal papers will uniquely advance its legislative objectives. The former president and his legal team asserted the investigations were nothing more than efforts to expose his finances for political gain. officials from receiving compensation from foreign powers. Trump's compliance with financial disclosure laws, the government's leasing of the Old Post Office that now houses the Trump Hotel and alleged violations of the Emoluments Clause, which prohibits U.S. In two subpoenas and supporting documents beginning in 2019, Democrats have argued they need all of the records to examine Mr. The long-running legal dispute has been working its way up and down the federal court system for two years, with the central question being whether Congress has shown a "legitimate legislative purpose" in requesting eight years of financial documents from Mazars USA, Mr. "The records corresponding to those justifications therefore must be disclosed," the judge wrote. But the congressional request for records related to the Trump Hotel and Congress' ability to craft legislation about under the Constitution's Foreign Emoluments Clause "do not implicate the same separation of powers concerns," he found. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |